The Breakdown Room - Queensryche Discussion Forum

  • December 19, 2014, 02:42:47 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The Breakdown Room is now closed. It has been a fun and effective 10 years. Thank you everyone.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 113   Go Down

Author Topic: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court  (Read 222234 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dcham1

  • En Forcer
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 139
  • I know, It's only Rock-n-Roll, but I like it.
    • Myspace

I wanted to start a thread on the ongoing lawsuit between the Tate's and the rest of the guys.  
I want to thank Samsara for putting a great idea for a thread.  Samsara is responsible for the below information.  

For those that want to follow this in the legal system, Geoff's complaint was filed in King County Superior Court (Washington). Case number 12-2-21829-3

It appears the complaint was filed on June 22. I can't seem to access records on it yet, however.

Here is the rundown of what has taken place so far though:

Superior Court Case Summary

Court: King Co Superior Ct
Case Number: 12-2-21829-3

Sub      Docket Date      Docket Code    Docket Description    Misc Info
1    06-22-2012    COMPLAINT    Complaint    
2    06-22-2012    SET CASE SCHEDULE
JDG0028    Set Case Schedule
Judge Carol Schapira, Dept 28    11-18-2013ST
3    06-22-2012    CASE INFORMATION COVER SHEET
LOCS    Case Information Cover Sheet
Original Location - Seattle    
4    06-22-2012    SUMMONS    Summons    
5    06-22-2012    SUMMONS    Summons    
6    06-22-2012    SUMMONS    Summons    
7    06-22-2012    SUMMONS    Summons    
8    06-22-2012    SUMMONS    Summons    
9    06-22-2012    SUMMONS    Summons    
10    06-22-2012    SUMMONS    Summons    
11    06-22-2012    SUMMONS    Summons    
« Last Edit: June 30, 2012, 04:32:40 PM by Samsara »
Logged

dcham1

  • En Forcer
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 139
  • I know, It's only Rock-n-Roll, but I like it.
    • Myspace
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2012, 12:57:53 PM »

As of today, here the the parties that have been summoned:

There are 11 public non-sealed cases that match your search criteria.

      Case Number     Judgment
Records      Name      File Date      Participant      Cause       Status
1     12-2-21829-3         Golden-jackson, Teresa      06-22-12      DEFENDANT       Injunction      Available
Docket Info
2     12-2-21829-3         Jackson, Eddie      06-22-12      DEFENDANT       Injunction      Available
Docket Info
3     12-2-21829-3         Melodisc      06-22-12      DEFENDANT       Injunction      Available
Docket Info
4     12-2-21829-3         Queensryche Merchandising Inc      06-22-12      DEFENDANT       Injunction      Available
Docket Info
5     12-2-21829-3         Rockenfield, Misty      06-22-12      DEFENDANT       Injunction      Available
Docket Info
6     12-2-21829-3         Rockenfield, Scott      06-22-12      DEFENDANT       Injunction      Available
Docket Info
7     12-2-21829-3         Tate, Geoff      06-22-12      PLAINTIFF       Injunction      Available
Docket Info
8     12-2-21829-3         Tate, Susan      06-22-12      PLAINTIFF       Injunction      Available
Docket Info
9     12-2-21829-3         Tri-ryche Corp      06-22-12      DEFENDANT       Injunction      Available
Docket Info
10     12-2-21829-3         Wilton, Kerrie L      06-22-12      DEFENDANT       Injunction      Available
Docket Info
11     12-2-21829-3         Wilton, Michael      06-22-12      DEFENDANT       Injunction   


Here is the latest on the docket:

12    06-27-2012    AFFIDAVIT/DCLR/CERT OF SERVICE    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service    
13    06-27-2012    AFFIDAVIT/DCLR/CERT OF SERVICE    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service    
14    06-27-2012    AFFIDAVIT/DCLR/CERT OF SERVICE    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service    
15    06-27-2012    AFFIDAVIT/DCLR/CERT OF SERVICE    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service    
16    06-27-2012    AFFIDAVIT/DCLR/CERT OF SERVICE    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service    
17    06-27-2012    AFFIDAVIT/DCLR/CERT OF SERVICE    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service    

looks like everyone just got served.

The web site address is:  http://dw.courts.wa.gov/index.cfm?fa=home.caselist&init


Wow, they have 11 people involved in this court case.  Is Eddie and Teresa divorced? 
This is gonna be a bumpy ride.
Logged

Lucretia

  • Khaleesi/Ice Queen
  • Administrator
  • Disciple of Dr. X
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 7251
  • The Most Fabulous Rattlesnake in the QR-Verse
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2012, 01:02:01 PM »

Dragging the wives into it too, eh? Ugh.
Logged
Purveyor of CENSORSHIP!!!!111!!11!1!  :rollin

ironwill

  • Global Mind
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 590
  • Lost in the EMPIRE! (state) NY RULES!!
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2012, 01:17:34 PM »

Dragging the wives into it too, eh? Ugh.
Dragging the wives into it too, eh? Ugh.
                                                                                                                                                                          Yeah, not even the mafia does that. I guess things are different with this mob. (pun intended)
Logged
Never follow trends that turn on your friends/Just be sure ya know who your friends are!!

erasion

  • Global Mind
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 825
  • Life is what you make it. Mine's a hamburger.
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2012, 02:29:24 PM »

Quote
3     12-2-21829-3         Melodisc      06-22-12      DEFENDANT       Injunction      Available
Docket Info

Who or what is Melodisc?
Logged
"I'm Queensryche." "No, I'm Queensryche." "I'm Queensryche, and so's my wife!"

Rage40rder

  • En Forcer
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 166
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #5 on: June 29, 2012, 02:35:15 PM »

Quote
3     12-2-21829-3         Melodisc      06-22-12      DEFENDANT       Injunction      Available
Docket Info

Who or what is Melodisc?

*Edit - Wrong Melodisc
« Last Edit: June 29, 2012, 02:45:31 PM by Rage40rder »
Logged

DarknessOnTheWay

  • Disciple of Dr. X
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1117
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2012, 02:38:47 PM »

Is melodisc their merch company?  The link took me to a OMC shirt.

DarknessOnTheWay

  • Disciple of Dr. X
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1117
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #7 on: June 29, 2012, 02:40:18 PM »

Parker wasn't issued a summons, nor was Todd... ?

dcham1

  • En Forcer
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 139
  • I know, It's only Rock-n-Roll, but I like it.
    • Myspace
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2012, 02:41:19 PM »

Here is what I have found on Melodisc.

MELODISC LTD
10751 DENSMORE AVE N
SEATTLE,  WA  98133-8943

COMPANY OVERVIEW

MELODISC LTD is in the LEGAL SERVICES industry in SEATTLE, WA. This company currently has approximately 1 to 5 employees and annual sales of Under $500,000.

Upon further research, I located whom it is:

Registered Agent Information
Agent Name   NEIL SUSSMAN
Address   10751 DENSMORE AVE N
City   SEATTLE
State   WA
ZIP   98133
This information is located on the Tri-Ryche Corporation Registration Page.

 
Logged

Samsara

  • 81 Percent Owner & Operator
  • Administrator
  • Disciple of Dr. X
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 14247
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #9 on: June 29, 2012, 02:41:37 PM »

Parker wasn't issued a summons, nor was Todd... ?

Why would they be? They were never partners in Queensryche, nor are they currently. band members, sure. But not members of the business structure.
Logged

Samsara

  • 81 Percent Owner & Operator
  • Administrator
  • Disciple of Dr. X
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 14247
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #10 on: June 29, 2012, 02:42:31 PM »

Here is what I have found on Melodisc.

MELODISC LTD
10751 DENSMORE AVE N
SEATTLE,  WA  98133-8943

COMPANY OVERVIEW

MELODISC LTD is in the LEGAL SERVICES industry in SEATTLE, WA. This company currently has approximately 1 to 5 employees and annual sales of Under $500,000.

Upon further research, I located whom it is:

Registered Agent Information
Agent Name   NEIL SUSSMAN
Address   10751 DENSMORE AVE N
City   SEATTLE
State   WA
ZIP   98133
This information is located on the Tri-Ryche Corporation Registration Page.

 


Neil Sussman was the band's attorney for eons. I have no idea if he currently is or not.
Logged

DarknessOnTheWay

  • Disciple of Dr. X
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1117
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #11 on: June 29, 2012, 02:42:50 PM »

Parker wasn't issued a summons, nor was Todd... ?

Why would they be? They were never partners in Queensryche, nor are they currently. band members, sure. But not members of the business structure.

Ahhh. gotcha.  Thanks

Lucretia

  • Khaleesi/Ice Queen
  • Administrator
  • Disciple of Dr. X
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 7251
  • The Most Fabulous Rattlesnake in the QR-Verse
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #12 on: June 29, 2012, 02:43:00 PM »

I'm kind of surprised to see Sussman listed as a defendant. For some reason, I kind of thought he'd be representing the Tates.
Logged
Purveyor of CENSORSHIP!!!!111!!11!1!  :rollin

dcham1

  • En Forcer
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 139
  • I know, It's only Rock-n-Roll, but I like it.
    • Myspace
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #13 on: June 29, 2012, 02:43:31 PM »

Parker wasn't issued a summons, nor was Todd... ?

Parker never had any stake in Tri-Ryche Corporation and Todd, they cant touch him because he performed with Rising West, not Queensryche
Logged

Samsara

  • 81 Percent Owner & Operator
  • Administrator
  • Disciple of Dr. X
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 14247
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #14 on: June 29, 2012, 02:45:16 PM »

Todd, they cant touch him because he performed with Rising West, not Queensryche

That's not the reason. Todd isn't a part of this because like Parker, he isn't an officer in the business structure. My guess is, he's a member of the band, but not a member of the business. Big distinction.
Logged

dcham1

  • En Forcer
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 139
  • I know, It's only Rock-n-Roll, but I like it.
    • Myspace
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #15 on: June 29, 2012, 02:46:29 PM »

Dragging the wives into it too, eh? Ugh.

Is Eddie and Teresa still married?  I read they divorced and he does not wear a wedding ring anymore in the latest pictures i have seen.
Logged

DarknessOnTheWay

  • Disciple of Dr. X
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1117
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #16 on: June 29, 2012, 02:47:10 PM »

So is this Geoff and Susan going after the rights to the name Queensryche?

dcham1

  • En Forcer
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 139
  • I know, It's only Rock-n-Roll, but I like it.
    • Myspace
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #17 on: June 29, 2012, 02:49:21 PM »

Todd, they cant touch him because he performed with Rising West, not Queensryche

That's not the reason. Todd isn't a part of this because like Parker, he isn't an officer in the business structure. My guess is, he's a member of the band, but not a member of the business. Big distinction.

Sorry, my mistake.  He is in the same boat like Parker
Logged

dcham1

  • En Forcer
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 139
  • I know, It's only Rock-n-Roll, but I like it.
    • Myspace
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #18 on: June 29, 2012, 02:50:36 PM »

Like Samsara said, the site is not displaying any legal documentation to access on the web site
Logged

Lucretia

  • Khaleesi/Ice Queen
  • Administrator
  • Disciple of Dr. X
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 7251
  • The Most Fabulous Rattlesnake in the QR-Verse
Re: On Going Queensryche legal battle in King County Superior Court
« Reply #19 on: June 29, 2012, 02:51:30 PM »

Dragging the wives into it too, eh? Ugh.

Is Eddie and Teresa still married?  I read they divorced and he does not wear a wedding ring anymore in the latest pictures i have seen.

I really don't know, to be honest. But she is named as a defendant, so...

And yeah, there's no way to tell yet exactly what this filing is for.
Logged
Purveyor of CENSORSHIP!!!!111!!11!1!  :rollin
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 113   Go Up